Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
2242 2210 500
Reposted frommythicwildcard mythicwildcard viaDragnur Dragnur
1991 303f 500
Reposted fromv2px v2px vianaich naich
If you want some theory stuff on that:
Masculine: Used for everything. If it's a normal and used german word, it will be masculine. Except for reasons ...
Neuter: objects or things that can't be "active". That's the reason, why the neuter lacks any real Nominativform. (yeah, now it's possible, thinking has changed)
Feminine: Everything that is abstract or some kind of plural (that's the origin) - and subsequently of that: every thing that's feminine

so: Der Schwimer (masculine)- the swimmer - someone who swimms
Das Schwimmen (neuter) - the swimming - the act of swimming
Die Schwimmerei (feminine) - the "abtract concept" of swimming

Also remember: The grammatical gender has nothing to do with actual gender. Like in english you only know if something has a penis (or whatever) if the word itself descripes something that has a penis.
I accidently read "Shot the main character" ... But worked out just fine ... 
5503 1308
Reposted fromlokrund2015 lokrund2015 viaLattemakauen Lattemakauen
Seinen Angaben zufolge wird sich der Ältestenrat des Parlaments am Donnerstag mit dem Hackerangriff beschäftigen.

Irgendwie befürchte ich, dass die gesamte Netzpolitik so gehandhabt wird...
Reposted fromfungi fungi vianaich naich
Reposted frompseikow pseikow vianaich naich
7177 fcb6
Reposted byfrittatensuppePsaikooutkapanibotsylwesterdzwiedzmstrznoxeringockisbacksfmimposterSkepticalprmbllrnasamusobugiepknoe3lhninjamonkeysabvelqzmushuboxcatsoadystafretkaSoulwoodadmndancingdemonsskillzmcflyreoxsefischerchaliellekacownikKurkaWyluzujinkwizytor919lovesweetsoversensitivejchigowarlordMilcatopyponurykosiarzbansheantonimloca-blueberryMotWatrantaczasnazupeDaro92saxnHypothermiasmoke11lamnedBadylSchweinekloetencinamonNetzteilJaswiciswtfknobspischusboozeStagen-nudelsalatkoenig-hagenviolatorderfroschimteeproligdepSkywalkerRedHeadCathsunakoandrewmyleshemsbeachtimmoecontroversialBubschabubaer
5981 45a3
Reposted fromdoener doener vianaich naich
2092 415c 500


A modern fairytale

Reposted fromYggry Yggry vianaich naich
Reposted fromnaich naich
Irgendwie bekomm ich immer Angst, wenn Leute wie der Gysi diese ganze geheimdienstliche Überwachung bekritteln. Irgendwie scheint mir bei diesem Personenkreis nicht das Dass das Problem zu sein, sondern deren Traum, was man alles mit diesen Daten anstellen könnte ...
8387 8960 500
Reposted bylailachaliellelomidrevo
Well, the quote identifies the lord's name with "Jesus Christ" (which is a problem on it's own), so we're in an christian context and so we should at least take the most basic christian statements into account.

The whole point of the sermon on the mount is basically: You should not be the worse asshole you can be without breaking the law - don't be an asshole at all.
So when Jesus says, that you should not even look at a woman with lustful intent, i think it's safe to say, that raping her is definitely not okay.

And this is not a statement about damaging another mans property (maybe you read the tenth commitment that way, we're discussing the sixth), but okay that doesn't answer the question if rape in marriage is okay.

Well, you have statements like that:
Husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. (eph5.28)
You may even quote something like this:
For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. (1. kor 7.4)

So, yeah, maybe you won't find "Don't rape your wife, fucktard!" but it's pretty clear that marriage shouldn't be shitty for anyone involved And rape is very shitty.
Well, the commandments say:
Exodus, 20.14: You shall not commit adultery.

"Jesus Christ"'s comment on that:
Matthew 5.28f: everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell.

So, no - Rape IS up there. Or you have to argue, that while thinking about something like that isn't okay, but actually doing it is fine~
Hm, Beamte nach Leistung bezahlen?
So einen progressiven Vorschlag hätte ich vom Deutschen Beamtenbund gar nicht erwartet.
Bin dafür!


Hinkt etwas...
Der Theologe überprüft durchaus. Er hat nur eine andere Fragestellung. Um im Bild zu bleiben - Der Theologe würde vermuten, dass Bier lecker schmeckt. Und wenn noch etwas Bier im Kühlschrank findet, können es sich der empirische Wissenschaftler und der Theologe schmecken lassen.
Und der Esoteriker... Der träumt davon, wie gut Eigenurin bei Mondschein schmeckt~
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!